I've been interested in tulpamancy for almost a year now. It's been a vague concept to me until recently, where I got to wondering if I could have a constant companion with which to communicate without religious aspects.
10:07 PM
Of course, they could have their own religion, but what I mean is that I'd like to learn what it's like to have someone there without the fear of prayer/damnation/not-good-enough/etc.
Have someone without-- that's very curious. I don't think normal people, even religious people, would push it into standard conversation all too much
11:49 PM
Come to think of it, I'm more likely to push for going to church than my host is as well as less likely to forget to pray before meals. I guess that's a thing for our system in particular. I'm sure your tulpa will develop in such a way as to be compatible with you at least as a companion
Making a tulpa is a selfish act, but then - most are. It also isn't a bad thing. The important point is how you actually intend to treat the tulpa.
4:45 PM
Your reason for making a tulpa isn't a particularly moral issue, though its possible effects on your capability of making a tulpa are perhaps more worthy of inspection.
Is there somewhere where I could share my "journal" of tulpamancy thus far? I started yesterday; I think having a second opinion on my personal ramblings would be helpful to me.
It's not really something you can put a probability on. You can just test it to see if it seems to be a different enough personality from yours to match someone else and if that someone else is like, a developed enough person to be functional in some way
I was just reading felights guide and he mentioned how vocality could sound the same as your mind voice
10:31 PM
And thought it was just a second me just argueing with myself over decisions and such, hmmm now it could be a possibility it was tulpa? I'm going crazy
It might be. Some people create whole arguments in their heads to play out though. If you’re confused, then the simpliest way to solve it would be to ask them (if they’re vocal)
10:36 PM
Well, I guess they would be vocal already since they’re arguing, but yeah
@Scentefy - If you can't tell the difference clearly at first, I would not recommend just assuming, as it might or might not be them. Try to figure out what would differentiate them from you. A lot of people do actively talk to themselves in their heads without having a tulpa, so that isn't likely an indicator of having a tulpa for a long time.(edited)
Hey, guys. I initiated the creation process today; it's really exciting! They're new to the world, with no chosen name or form as of now. But I feel like we're making progress, slowly but surely.
In the end, if it isn't outright clear - in the case that you aren't able to tell the difference easily for whatever reason: inexperience, similarity of them talking, not being used to the "mind voice", etc - it becomes a question of probability. Try to minimize the possibility of error, and keep in mind that simply accepting "I don't know" and moving on is perfectly valid and honest.
That's true. It may end up somehow useful to merge that sort of idea of a voice automatically responding with the tulpa so that even if it wasn't that way to start it's a weird throughline for the mind to get the tulpa to talk. I don't think parroting is a terrible method for forcing after all, it's just one of the things people can make much worse purely by thinking too much or somehow not focusing on developing it
I think that parroting should be treated quite carefully in this case - constantly parroting does establish a habit of doing so, which is... Not good. I don't see anything wrong with it, however, if it lies within clearly demarked times and avoided outside of those times.
just make sure you clearly know when you are parroting that you are in fact doing so, after all you wouldn't want to mistake your tulpa's actual vocality for parroting(edited)
Hmm, I wonder if I'm thinking of the same thing now. I thought parroting was-- well, letting your mind naturally simulate the personality you're trying to conceptualize and let have some agency, right? So when the simulation gets so smooth that it's nearly automatic, I would think that the simulation is the tulpa in the normal functional sense?(edited)
I know there are some people who suffered uhh, worse situations from parroting, I just don't really know how it works all too well enough to understand the function of a-- "fake tulpa" I guess it would be
Well if it's legitimately parroting and you think that you're likely to have issues, it might be good to uhh, to just wait or something. I don't know for sure, I just know that one person who was active went the parroting route and then at some point seemed to admit that a lot of messed up sort of denial problems were happening.
Ah, no. "Parroting" is technically deliberate only. However, it is a more specific name for a broader phenomenon - the host making up responses in place of the tulpa.
3:18 AM
And, proceeding to pretend that it was the tulpa that made those responses.
Parrotnoia is skepticism with assumptions. Do be concerned about simply making up responses in place of your tulpa, but there isn't any reason to overstress about it.